BEAVER VALLEY RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION

 

www.beavervalleyratepayers.ca

 

NEWSLETTER

 

SUMMER 2008

 

 

SIGNAGE: “You are now entering the Niagara Escarpment”

The BVRA holds an organizational membership within the Coalition of the Niagara Escarpment (CONE). For several years the BVRA has been working with CONE to secure signage for Grey County to publicize the Niagara Escarpment. In July, we learned that 4 signs would be erected on Grey roads leading to the escarpment. The signs are mounted at Grey #2, south of Kolapore, Grey # 13, north of Grey #4, Grey #18, west of Grey #29, and Grey #18, west of Rockford.

 

ROAD SAFETY:

BVRA members will be aware of the efforts to erect a mirror at Bowles Bluff Road and Grey #30. Ratepayers declared strongly that reduced speed signs and hidden intersection signs did not meet safety needs for maneuvering through this blind intersection.  After the Annual General Meeting, we again corresponded with Grey County Transportation, and emphasized the critical danger, which this intersection poses for the community. These mirrors are common throughout Europe, and exist on some roads in Ontario. The transportation committee has heard our concerns, and a mirror has been erected.

 

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING: CONE

The Annual General Meeting of CONE will be held on Sat.Sept. 28 in Kimberley Hall. BVRA members are welcome. It is an opportunity to hear about CONE’S latest project to protect water quality in the Niagara Escarpment. The guest speaker will be Shane Jolley of Owen Sound who is the deputy leader of The Green Party of Ontario.

 

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: Beaver Valley Village

As mandated at the March 2008 BVRA membership meeting we have researched the “Beaver Valley Village” subdivision proposal.

 

No one can definitively state what the risks are to this area’s water resource if this proposed development is allowed to proceed. Much more research and hydro geological examination by expert people is required before that determination can be definitively defined. However we do know that this water resource is far more sensitive to development than was previously understood.  The residents’ concerns with this development are justified

 

We cannot continue to address each subdivision application individually and ignore the Big Picture.  We must assess the ‘Cumulative Impact’ of all potential development in this area and ensure development will not create or contribute to any long-term problems of water quality or quantity for the proposed subdivision and/or surrounding area. The potential negative impact to the environment, municipality and residents will be costly and difficult (if not impossible) to mitigate.

 

The BVRA requested Grey Highlands Council to immediately form a committee to examine the cumulative impact of development in this area. This committee would report to Council. The committee’s mandate would be:

-         Temporary in nature until definitive guidelines, ground rules and legislation are implemented which address these issues.

-         To make recommendations based on consensus.

-         To ensure all voices are heard, representation would include applicable Conservation Authorities, Environment Ministries, Developers, Beaver Valley Ski Club and BVRA.

-         To use available knowledge based on groundwater resource in the Bowles Bluff area with a view of the “Cumulative Impact” and provide council with timely input and recommendations on current and planned development.

-         To make the proposed “Beaver Valley Village” subdivision the first order of business.

A letter was sent to Grey Highlands Council followed up by a number of presentations to Planners and Council. In June, Council refused the suggestion on the grounds it was redundant to existing policies.

This decision was a disappointment.

We then decided to divide the problems into 2 distinct areas.

-         Definitively define the risk

-         Fight the scope of the proposed subdivision using existing processes

 

Defining the Risk:

In 2007 the Ontario “Source Water Protection Act” was passed into law. This act also formed a number of “Source Water Protection Committees”(SPC) throughout the province. Their mandate was to examine in detail all urban water systems in Ontario. They have available all the environmental and geologic expertise to enable this function. They are mandated to have recommendations ready within 5 years. Research data will be available to municipal planners within 1-2 years to aid in local planning efforts.

 

Rural water systems are not included in their mandate except for one instance. “Cluster Well Locations” (5 private wells accessing one aquifer) could be included within the SPC mandate if the local Municipal Council approved “Elevated Status” for the location. A survey of the Bowles Bluff area indicated approximately 80 private wells.

 

BVRA made presentations to the SPC and Grey Highlands Council requesting elevated status for the Bowles Bluff Area. We were successful. By a vote of 4-3 Grey Highlands Council approved elevated status for the Bowles Bluff area.

 

The research performed by this committee should finally definitively define the risk factors in the Bowles Bluff Area. However the results will be long after the “Beaver Valley Village “ proposal is decided.

 

Fighting the Scope of the Proposed Subdivision:

We know:

-         Water resources are far more sensitive to development than was previously understood.

-         The Bowles Bluff area is a “Karstic” area, which is a known to be highly sensitive to water issues.

-         No one has done the work to definitively define the risk

We therefore cannot support the proposed “Beaver Valley Village” subdivision. The BVRA intends to be an objector at all levels of this approval process based on the following issues

 

Our objections will be presented at the County and Municipal levels and will refer to the following issues:

-         Known environmental risks in the Bowles Bluff area. Development moratorium on major developments required until SPC report is tabled

-         Designation of “Development Area” around Bowles Bluff does not meet the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Bowles Bluff is not considered a hamlet in County or Municipal Official plan and no municipal services are planned as called for in the PPS.

-         Proposed 45-lot development does not meet the PPS, which limits rural developments to a maximum of 5 homes when using private well and sewage systems.

-         Why is the subdivision even being entertained when it doesn’t meet the requirements laid out in the PPS?

 

Nothing speaks better to councils than the high participation and turnout of our members at Council meetings and presentations. The BVRA member support is appreciated by your Directors.

 

CANADIAN NATIONAL TAXPAYERS COALITION:

The two-year moratorium of property assessments is over.  Unfortunately the people of Ontario were so concerned with “faith-based” schools that the issues facing ratepayers were not addressed during the Provincial elections in 2007.  Now it seems we are “locked in” to market-value assessments and new large assessment increases as of January 2009.  The current government supports Current (Market) Value Assessment.  It sees property taxes and assessment as a “money stream” and encourages towns and cities to grab it (i.e. Toronto Act).  A provincial committee is meeting to create a provincial-municipal funding model that should be fair to everybody.  Many mayors and Councils are waiting for the decisions!  The provincial Ombudsman, Andre Marin, in consultation with groups, including CNTC, brought down 22 improvements in the operation of how MPAC calculates your property assessment.  As part of the March budget, the Province legislated MPAC to prove why your assessment is correct, rather than you proving why it is wrong, upon appeal.  Obviously, we are all waiting to see what happens to our assessments.  It is unwise to think that everything will stay the same.  NOW WHAT?  The CNTC is working on a manual for their members that will provide details on how to appeal your assessment.  This manual costs $9.98 (which includes shipping) and will be available this fall to members only.  If you wish to become a member of the CNTC (membership fee $20) and therefore be eligible to order a copy of the manual, contact CNTC at info@cntccanada.ca.

 

 

 

With sadness we learned of the death of David Box who had been a director for just over one year. David resigned from the Board in January 2008 for health reasons. David had been a resident in the valley for approximately 35 years, and was committed to maintaining a natural and healthy Beaver Valley.

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

Donald McGee   Co-chair              519-986-2640

Ernie Glozier                  Co-chair              519-986-2886

Anne Ellison                   Secty/Treas.       647-827-6045

Tom Armstrong              Mem-at-large     519-986-4627

Geoff Drew-Brook         Mem-at-large     519-986-3150

Catherine Little   Mem-at-large     519-986-4369

Lou Saunders                 Mem-at-large     519-986-2866

 

 

 

 

Please feel free to pass this newsletter onto your neighbours, and refer to our website for past newsletters.

www.beavervalleyratepayers.ca

 

Annual membership fee is $20.00, payable to Beaver Valley Ratepayers Assoc. Mailing address is 205-80 Palace Pier Ct.,

Toronto, M8V 4C1